Over 2,000 patients removed with immediate effect from GP practices in 2017

Over 2,000 patients removed with immediate effect from GP practices in 2017

May 23 2018 Over 2,000 patients were removed from GP lists due to allegations of violence or...

New GP workforce figures ‘yet another hammer blow’

New GP workforce figures ‘yet another hammer blow’

May 17 2018 The RCGP has described the latest GP workforce data as “yet another hammer...

BMA, RCP respond to reports of PM blocking relaxation of tier 2 visa cap for doctors

BMA, RCP respond to reports of PM blocking relaxation of tier 2 visa cap for doctors

May 9 2018 Doctors’ representatives have described reports that the Prime Minister rejected...

GP e-referrals hits 100% in North East

GP e-referrals hits 100% in North East

April 30 2018 Electronic referrals by GP to hospital are now available for 100% of patients in...

‘e-Traffic light’ GP referral system indicates expected time to hospital appointment

‘e-Traffic light’ GP referral system indicates expected time to hospital appointment

April 23 2018 A pilot scheme is highlighting anticipated waiting times for a hospital referral,...

  • Over 2,000 patients removed with immediate effect from GP practices in 2017

    Over 2,000 patients removed with immediate effect from GP practices in 2017

    Wednesday, 23 May 2018 14:17
  • New GP workforce figures ‘yet another hammer blow’

    New GP workforce figures ‘yet another hammer blow’

    Thursday, 17 May 2018 15:31
  • BMA, RCP respond to reports of PM blocking relaxation of tier 2 visa cap for doctors

    BMA, RCP respond to reports of PM blocking relaxation of tier 2 visa cap for doctors

    Wednesday, 09 May 2018 16:07
  • GP e-referrals hits 100% in North East

    GP e-referrals hits 100% in North East

    Monday, 30 April 2018 12:25
  • ‘e-Traffic light’ GP referral system indicates expected time to hospital appointment

    ‘e-Traffic light’ GP referral system indicates expected time to hospital appointment

    Monday, 23 April 2018 17:07

a dr on phone imageFebruary 1 2018

Alternatives to face-to-face GP consultations may not deliver as many benefits as originally hoped, a qualitative study has suggested. Any reduction in GP workload brought about by conducting consultations via the phone, email, e-consultation systems or internet video “may be both modest and gradual.”


The study published in the British Journal of General Practice involved observation and interviews with staff and patients in eight general practices. The researchers also reviewed documentation and protocols.

Among the findings were that:

  • practices had different reasons for introducing the alternative consultation methods;
  • there were different views on which patients and conditions would be suitable;
  • co-workers were unaware about their colleagues’ practices;
  • protocols drawn up by practices were not known or followed.

However, the researchers also found that patients were reporting benefits including convenience and access, and “staff and some patients regarded the face-to-face consultation as the ideal.”

The National Institute for Health Research, which funded the study, noted: “NHS policy encourages general practices to introduce alternatives to face-to-face consultations as a way of increasing access to healthcare and reducing GP workload. However, the evidence on their use and effectiveness is limited.

“Although there were some potential benefits, there were also significant barriers to implementation, with practices often responding to incentives to introduce new technologies without a clear rationale or clearly thinking through the likely costs and benefits for patients and practice staff.”

The research was led by the University of Bristol in collaboration with the Universities of Warwick, Oxford, Edinburgh and Exeter.

Professor Chris Salisbury from the University of Bristol’s Centre for Academic Primary Care said: “Technological alternatives to face-to-face GP consultations are being pushed as the solution to reducing GP workloads and increasing patient access to primary care services. The reality on the ground is that implementation is difficult. Practices are introducing the technologies for different reasons and a ‘one size fits all’ approach will not work.

“Our study shows that, currently, GP practices are struggling to identify and implement the most beneficial uses of these new technologies and they are frequently being adopted without sufficient understanding or support. In particular, we identified a tension between the desire to make access to health care easier and more convenient, while at the same time aiming to reduce GP workload. We found that new ways of accessing health care advice may well increase rather than decrease GP workload.”

Professor Kamila Hawthorne, RCGP Vice Chair, said: “Innovative use of technology must continue to be explored in general practice, as long as it is safe, effective and leads to better outcomes for our patients, the GP practice and the NHS as a whole. Patient safety must be paramount in any clinical consultations.

“Many GP practices are already offering online consultations in some form, and we know that they are convenient for some patients. However, we also know – and this research backs this up – that they don’t necessarily help to alleviate workload pressures on GPs, or improve access to general practice services for patients … if practices do choose to offer them, then it should be as one way to access GP services, not the only way.”

Prof Hawthorne endorsed the researchers’ recommendation for practices to carefully consider the implications of introducing alternative consultation methods for the practice and patients. The RCGP is developing guidance on this, she said, adding: “If this route to consulting with patients is being considered by a practice, practice policies must be developed carefully, agreed by all in the practice, and followed to ensure patient safety.”

Links:
H Atherton et al. Alternatives to the face-to-face consultation in general practice: focused ethnographic case study. Br J Gen Pract 29 January 2018; bjgp18X694853.           
NIHR statement            
RCGP statement           

Management News

May 24 2018 Patients who see the same GP over time are admitted to hospital less often than similar individuals who see the same GP less often, a report has noted.
May 24 2018 Patients who see the same GP over time are admitted to hospital less often than similar individuals who see the same GP less often, a report has noted. The Health Foundation has examined...